Easy Truck Shop VS Fullbay
Choosing shop management software is a big decision. This page gives you a clear, side by side look at Easy Truck Shop (ETS) and Fullbay across the workflows that matter most: work orders, scheduling, mobile tech tools, inventory, estimates, payments, reporting, integrations, onboarding, and pricing.
Top Features
Explore the Key Advantages of Each Platform
Easy Truck Shop
Pros
Fast to adopt: The interface is simple enough that most teams can create work orders, schedule jobs, and invoice within the first day, without formal training.
Faster workflow: Drag and drop scheduling, mobile updates with photos and notes, quick estimates that convert to jobs, and straightforward parts handling reduce back-and-forth and idle time.
Better cash flow: Built-in Stripe payments, clear pricing, and practical reporting help invoices go out faster and make it easier to track what is billed, paid, and outstanding.
Cons
Integration breadth still growing: The customer portal and some advanced integrations are in active development, so you may need interim workarounds.
Community size: Fewer public tutorials and templates than older systems, although support is responsive.
Limited proof at very large scale: Best fit today is small to mid-size shops rather than highly complex enterprise fleets.
FullBay
Pros
Broad, mature toolkit: work orders, scheduling, inventory, invoicing, reporting, and a customer portal, plus mobile tools for technicians.
Integration depth: Connects to labor time guides, wiring diagrams, accounting, payments, and messaging tools.
Structured onboarding: Offers guided implementation and training materials for larger teams.
Cons
High total cost: Per-user pricing and add-ons can raise monthly spend for small shops.
Learning curve: New users often need training to move quickly through parts, time, and review steps.
Heavy footprint: Broad feature set can feel excessive for simple repair workflows.
Should I Buy EasyTruckShop or Fullbay?
Choose EasyTruckShop if you want a platform that your team can use immediately with little or no training. ETS keeps the core workflow simple from estimate to invoice, has a visual scheduler that is easy to reshuffle during the day, and gives technicians clean mobile tools for photos, notes, and time. Stripe payments and predictable pricing help cash flow and make budgeting straightforward. If you value speed, low admin, and responsive support, ETS is a strong fit for independent shops and mobile repair teams, and for small to mid-size operations that do not need dozens of specialized integrations on day one.
Choose Fullbay if your shop needs a customer portal today, relies on labor time guides or wiring diagrams, or runs a more complex multi-location setup. Fullbay’s breadth and established ecosystem are useful when you want deeper ties to third-party content and are ready to invest time in guided onboarding. The trade-off can be a higher total cost and a steeper learning curve.
A practical way to decide is to run the same job in both demos from intake to payment. Time each step, note any bottlenecks, and check which system your techs are comfortable with after a single walkthrough.
Conclusion
Both platforms can run a modern heavy-duty shop. ETS emphasizes ease of use, quick adoption, and clear pricing, which helps teams move faster and invoice sooner without adding administrative overhead. Fullbay emphasizes breadth and integrations.
If your priority is getting a busy team productive with minimal change management, ETS is a sensible first choice that still leaves room to grow.